Ophthalmological Outcomes in Patients with Susac Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To report ophthalmological outcomes and treatment regimen in patients with Susac syndrome. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with Susac syndrome treated between November 2015 and March 2023. Multimodal imaging findings, ophthalmic examination data, information on neurological and sensorineural involvement, and therapeutic regimen were reviewed. Visual acuity was recorded as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Ophthalmological manifestations and disease severity were assessed using the previously described clinical activity score (CAS). RESULTS: Ten patients with Susac syndrome m : f = 5 : 5 were identified. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 ± 23.3 months (range 1 to 78 months). The mean age was 41.4 ± 13.8 years (range 21 to 59 years). At baseline, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.03 ± 0.08 logMAR. At the last follow-up, CDVA improved to 0.00 ± 0.03 logMAR (p = 0.029). Three of 20 eyes showed an improvement of 5 letters, while no loss of visual acuity was recorded during the follow-up time. Baseline CAS was 10.65 ± 12.69, and CAS at the last follow-up was 5.15 ± 5.49 (p = 0.068). Except for one patient, all were initially treated with intravenous (i. v.) steroids and subsequent oral tapering. Depending on the treatment response, cyclophosphamide (n = 4), i. v. immunoglobulins (IVIGs) (n = 4), anti-CD20 antibodies (n = 3), or plasmapheresis (n = 1) were applied. All patients under treatment for more than 1 month (n = 9) showed improvement in CAS and CDVA. CONCLUSION: Susac syndrome is a rare autoimmune vascular endotheliopathy. Treatment of Susac syndrome appears to result in improving CAS and CDVA. The majority of patients, in addition to the systemic steroids, required systemic immunosuppressive agents. Interdisciplinary communication is crucial to reduce the time to diagnosis and initiation of therapy in patients with Susac syndrome.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in refractory Susac's syndrome: A brief report.

Susac's syndrome (SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy that typically presents with the clinical triad of encephalopathy, hearing loss, and branch retinal artery occlusion. It has a wide range of possible presentations, and its pathogenesis remains uncertain. Fulminant and refractory cases are difficult to treat, and no standard treatment protocol has been established. However, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been described as an adjunctive therapy in several SuS cases. Herein we present a case of a 63-year-old male with debilitating encephalopathy and recent hearing and vision loss, who responded favorably to TPE. Given this and other published reports of plasma exchange therapy for SuS, treatment protocols should consider TPE in early stages of disease.

Susac syndrome - A review of current knowledge and own experience.

Susac syndrome is a rare connective tissue disorder. The pathology affects the small vessels of the brain, retina, and inner ear, and therefore the main symptoms of the disease include encephalopathy, visual disturbances, and sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this article is to review the current medical knowledge on Susac syndrome and to present our clinical experience regarding this disease entity. In the paper, we are also presenting a case of a 25-year-old patient who was diagnosed with Susac syndrome on the basis of clinical presentation and additional test results. Susac syndrome should be differentiated from multiple sclerosis and other causes of multifocal brain damage as early diagnosis and treatment play a key role in later prognosis.

Clinical characteristics and treatment approaches in patients with Susac syndrome: a scoping review of cases.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare disease characterized by encephalopathy, hearing impairment and visual disturbances. Immunosuppressive treatments are used based on the hypothesis that an autoimmune endotheliopathy drives the disease. However, a solid evidence-based treatment approach is lacking. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of patient characteristics, disease course and treatment patterns related to successful outcome that have been reported in literature since 2013. METHODS: Three reviewers conducted a systematic literature search in February 2022. The primary outcome was treatment used, derived from cases classified as probable or definite SuS, describing successful treatment outcome (i.e. no signs of disease activity for ≥ 1 month). Secondary outcomes were time-to-relapse and follow-up time. Published case reports and case series were included. Various clinical characteristics and treatment(s) were extracted and categorized into different phases of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 810 records was identified. 120 articles met inclusion criteria and 161 cases were extracted. Of these, 151 cases were classified as probable or definite SuS and included in the final analysis. Number of combinations of treatments used per treatment phase were: 6 empirically, 35 after confirmed diagnosis, 43 for maintenance treatment, 22 after relapse, 18 during maintenance post-relapse. Median follow-up time was 12.3 months (0.5; 120) and median time to relapse was 4 months (1; 120). CONCLUSION: This scoping review summarizes treatment approaches in patients with SuS, highlighting variability. International efforts to collect clinical, imaging and treatment data from patients with SuS in registries are needed, in order to provide less biased and long-term follow-up information on treatment response, predictors of relapse and patient outcomes. This may lead to more evidence-based therapeutic approaches.

Susac syndrome: neurological update (clinical features, long-term observational follow-up and management of sixteen patients).

Susac syndrome is a likely autoimmune microangiopathy affecting the brain, retina and inner ear. Due to the rarity of this condition, diagnosis and treatment can be challenging. Diagnosis is based on the presence of the clinical triad of central nervous system dysfunction, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. Typical MRI findings of callosal and peri-callosal lesions may assist in diagnosis. Clinical course can be monophasic, polycyclic or chronic continuous. It is important to look out for red flags to attain an accurate diagnosis and follow a therapeutic algorithm based on severity of the disease and response to treatment. Patients are treated with steroids and immunosuppressive agents with a variable response. Early aggressive treatment especially in severe cases, may help in preventing relapses and morbidity/disability. This study highlights important diagnostic features and proposes a treatment algorithm based on clinical experience from management of 16 patients from 2 neuroscience centres in the UK since 2007, who were followed up over a long period of 3-15 years.

Characteristics and management of Susac syndrome in an emergent country: a multi-center case series from Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare endotheliopathy with an estimated prevalence of 0.14-0.024 per 100,000. It is an important differential diagnosis in demyelinating disorders. There are few case series and no large randomized controlled trials, and most reports come from developed countries. We report six cases of SS in three centers in Brazil and discuss management challenges in emergent countries. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with SS in three medical centers in Brazil between April 2018 and July 2021. The European Susac consortium (EuSaC) criteria were used for diagnosis of SS. Demographic data and clinical interventions were described and outcomes were assessed subjectively and by applying the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on last follow-up. RESULTS: Six patients were diagnosed with SS (3 males, 3 females). Mean age at presentation was 36 years (range 17 to 54). The most common initial symptom was confusion, followed by visual impairment and hearing loss. Characteristic snowball lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were present in four patients (66%). Retinal artery abnormalities were present in half (3/6) of patients, and sensorineural hearing loss was present in four patients (66%). Outcome was favorable (mRS ≤ 2) in five patients (86%). Patients treated early had a more favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Emergent countries face challenges in the diagnosis and management of patients with SS, such as access to advanced tests (fluorescein angiography, serial MRI) and treatment drugs (rituximab, mycophenolate). Further research should consider particularities of patients with SS in emergent countries.

Susac Syndrome Presenting as Recurrent Strokes.

Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare clinical entity that affects primarily young women and might result in significant morbidity. The triad that leads to suspecting the disease has classically been involvement of the brain, retina and inner ear. The likely pathology of the disease is thought to be immune mediated endotheliopathy; given its clinical and, possibly, pathological remission with immunosuppressive therapy. Here we describe an uncommon recurrent stroke in a young female that unfolds to Susac syndrome at the end. We also reviewed the literature behind diagnosis and treatment. Delayed diagnosis is associated with worse morbidity and mortality, and the most important predictor of long-term prognosis in the reported cases is the time to diagnosis. Therapies tried (with variable success) include corticosteroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab. The prognosis of SS is difficult to predict given the absence of strong clinical or radiographic features to suggest better/worse prognosis at the time of initial diagnosis. Brain MRIs and hearing/vision impairment have never normalized in previously studied cohort of patients.

Susac syndrome: challenges in the diagnosis and treatment.

Susac syndrome is a disorder thought to be mediated by an autoimmune response towards endothelial cells, leading to a characteristic clinical triad of encephalopathy, visual disturbances due to branch arterial occlusions and sensorineural hearing impairment. Although it is a rare disease, three reasons make it important. First, given its variable presentation, Susac syndrome is underdiagnosed. Second, it is considered an important differential diagnosis in different neurological, psychiatric, ophthalmological and hearing disorders, and consequently is frequently misdiagnosed. Third, in many cases, Susac syndrome is diagnosed and treated late, with significant irreversible sequelae including dementia, blindness and hearing loss. Neuropathology findings derived from both Susac syndrome patient tissue and novel transgenic mouse models indicate cytotoxic CD8+ T cells adhere to microvessels, inducing endothelial cell swelling, vascular narrowing and occlusion, causing microinfarcts. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies are present in serum in 25% of Susac syndrome patients, but it is unclear whether they are aetiologically related to the disease, or an epiphenomenon. The clinical triad comprising encephalopathy, branch arterial occlusions, and sensorineural hearing impairment is considered pathognomonic, although great variability is found in presentation and natural course of disease. At first evaluation, only 13-30% of patients exhibit the full clinical triad, making diagnosis difficult. Retinal fluorescein angiography, optic coherence tomography, MRI and tonal audiometry are helpful methods for diagnosing and monitoring disease activity during treatment. By contrast, there are no reliable objective immune markers to monitor disease activity. Immunosuppression is the current treatment, with high-dose corticosteroid therapy as the mainstay, but additional therapies such as intravenous immunoglobulins, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are often necessary, because the disease can be devastating, causing irreversible organ damage. Unfortunately, low rates of disease, variability in presentation and paucity of objective biomarkers make prospective controlled clinical trials for Susac syndrome treatment difficult. Current immunosuppressive treatments are therefore based on empirical evidence, mainly from retrospective case series and expert opinion. In this review, we draw attention to the need to take consider Susac syndrome in the differential diagnosis of different neurological, psychiatric, ophthalmological and hearing disorders. Furthermore, we summarize our current knowledge of this syndrome, in reference to its pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, emphasizing the need for prospective and controlled studies that allow a better therapeutic approach.

Susac's syndrome - A new ocular finding and disease outcome.

BACKGROUND: Susac's syndrome, a rare autoimmune vasculo-occlusive disease, may pose a diagnostic challenge and result in a devastating ocular and systemic outcome. Our study identifies a new retinal finding and evaluates disease outcome. We aimed to assess clinical and imaging findings, systemic manifestations and disease outcome in patients with ocular Susac's syndrome under immunosuppressive/immunomodulation therapies. METHODS: Retrospective tertiary center study including patients with a diagnosis of Susac's syndrome with >12 months follow up. Medical record review including ocular, neurological and auditory clinical and imaging findings, and treatment modalities. Main outcome measures were clinical manifestations and disease outcome. RESULTS: Seven patients (14 eyes) with a mean age of 34.1 years were included. Mean follow-up was 31.9 months (12.4-72.4). All had bilateral ocular disease. Retinal microaneurysms, a new ocular finding, were demonstrated in 5 patients and persisted at the final visit. In 5 eyes, they further extended during follow-up. All were treated with immunosuppressive drugs and 5/7 additional immunomodulation therapy. At last examination, best corrected visual acuity was >20/40 in all eyes, 1/10 eyes had visual field deterioration, no eye had active ocular disease, all patients achieved neurological stability, and 1 patient had auditory deterioration. CONCLUSION: Retinal microaneurysms, a new ocular finding in Susac's syndrome, were present in most of our patients, indicating ischemic retinal damage. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulation therapies seem to be highly effective in the control of disease activity.

Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of Susac syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses general features and organ-specific presentations of Susac syndrome as well as diagnosis and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Latest literature regarding demographics, new diagnostic modalities such as optical coherence tomography and treatment options for Susac syndrome are discussed in detail in this review, summarizing the most recent updated information. SUMMARY: Susac syndrome is a rare, underdiagnosed, and often misdiagnosed disease that can lead to severe complications such as deafness, vision loss, dementia, and death. It involves the central nervous system and may mimic other neurological and neuro-ophthalmological diseases.

The neuro-otology of Susac syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We characterised the clinical and neuro-otological characteristics of patients with Susac syndrome. METHODS: The medical records of 30 patients with Susac syndrome were reviewed for details of their clinical presentation and course, neuro-otological symptoms, investigation results including audiology and vestibular function tests, treatment and outcomes. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that 29 of our 30 patients with Susac syndrome developed neuro-otological symptoms such as hearing loss, disequilibrium, tinnitus or vertigo during their disease course. Hearing loss was the most common neuro-otological symptom occurring in 93% of patients. A rising configuration of low-frequency greater than the high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss was the most characteristic finding on audiological testing (37% of reviewed audiograms). Disproportionately poor speech discrimination was identified in 20% of cases, and one case demonstrated a retrocochlear pattern on electrophysiological testing. Four patients required hearing aids and a further two patients required a cochlear implant due to severe hearing loss. Two out of two treated patients had improvements in hearing after the prompt administration of corticosteroids, indicating the potential for recoverable hearing loss if relapses are treated early. Effects on vestibular function were variable in ten patients who were tested, with most showing preservation of function despite significant hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Neuro-otological symptoms in Susac syndrome are almost universal. In the correct clinical context, a rising configuration of low to high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss should prompt consideration of Susac syndrome. Treatment of inner ear symptoms in Susac syndrome requires further research as early immunotherapy may be beneficial.

Guidelines for treatment of Susac syndrome - An update.

Susac syndrome is an immune-mediated, pauci-inflammatory, ischemia-producing, occlusive microvascular endotheliopathy/basement membranopathy that affects the brain, retina, and inner ear. Treatment of Susac syndrome is particularly challenging. The organs involved can easily become irreversibly damaged, and the window of opportunity to protect them is often short. Optimal outcome requires rapid and complete disease suppression. Adding to the challenge is the absence of objective biomarkers of disease activity and the great variability in presentation, timing and extent of peak severity, duration of peak severity, and natural disease course. There have been no randomized controlled trials or prospective treatment studies. We offer treatment guidelines based on cumulative clinical experience and a large cohort of patients followed longitudinally in a comprehensive database project. These guidelines state our preferences but do allow flexibility and discuss other options. The guidelines also serve as an initial step in the planning of prospective treatment studies, future consensus-based recommendations, and future randomized controlled trials.

Goya's Lost Hearing: A Twenty-First Century Perspective on Its Cause, Effects and Possible Treatment.

Francisco Goya produced over 1,800 works during his long career, which earned him a reputation as one of the greatest artists of modern times. When he was 47, he developed a mysterious illness that destroyed his hearing, and for the next 35 years left him "deaf as a stump." Of the diagnoses proposed to date, Susac syndrome is the one most consistent with what little we do know of the character of that illness. If he were alive today, given the severity of his hearing loss, Goya would be treated with a cochlear implant, which might restore his ability to communicate in spoken language, though probably not to the level preceding his 1793 illness.

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Algorithm for Susac Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SS) classically presents with the clinical triad of retinal artery occlusion, sensorineural hearing loss, and encephalopathy and the neuroimaging triad of white matter lesions, deep gray matter lesions, and leptomeningeal disease. However, patients can present with an incomplete clinical or neuroimaging triads making diagnosis difficult in certain situations. A standard treatment paradigm also is lacking in this illness. It is important for neuro-ophthalmologists to recognize clinical and radiographic findings that are pathognomonic for this syndrome and have a basic understanding of the available treatment options. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Review of medical literature. RESULTS: A definite diagnosis of SS is made when the clinical triad or the neuroimaging triad is present. There are numerous reports of 2 other imaging findings in this condition: arteriolar wall hyperfluorescence (AWH) on fluorescein angiography in retinal arterioles remote from retinal ischemia and central callosal lesions on MRI. Both of these imaging findings are diagnostic of SS. Gass plaques in retinal arterioles are almost always seen in the acute phase of the illness but are not pathognomonic for SS. The most common medications used in this syndrome are corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. A number of other medications have been used including mycopheolate, rituximab, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of the clinical triad or magnetic resonance imaging triad for SS, AWH remote from retinal vascular injury and central callosal lesions are confirmatory of the diagnosis because they have never been described in any other condition. The presence of Gass plaques in retinal arterioles should strongly suggest the diagnosis. Despite the lack of clinical trial data, patients with SS must be treated promptly and aggressively. In more fulminant cases, addition of mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab is required, followed by cyclophosphamide when disease is refractory to other medications.

Clinical and imaging features distinguishing Susac syndrome from primary angiitis of the central nervous system.

INTRODUCTION: To assess clinical and/or imaging features useful to distinguish between Susac syndrome (SuS) and primary angiitis of central nervous system (PACNS). METHODS: Multicenter retrospective analysis of two cohorts of Argentine patients diagnosed with SuS and PACNS. RESULTS: 13 patients diagnosed with SuS (6 women and 7 men, mean age 35 ±â€¯10 years) and 15 with PACNS (10 women and 5 men, mean age 44 ±â€¯18 years) were analyzed. Cognitive impairment (11 out of 13 patients vs. 5 out of 15, p = .006), ataxia (7 out of 13 vs. 2 out of 15, p = .042) and auditory disturbances (7 out of 13 vs. 0 out of 15, p = .003) were more frequent in SuS patients; whereas seizures were more frequent in PACNS patients (8 out of 15 vs. 1 out of 13, p = .035). On MRI, corpus callosum (CC) involvement was observed more often in SuS, with abnormalities in CC genu, in 13 out of 13 SuS patients vs. only 2 out of 15 PACNS patients (p < .001); in CC body these were present in 13 out of 13 SuS patients vs. 1 out of 15 PACNS patients, (p < .001); and in CC splenium in 12 out of 13 Sus patients vs. 1 of 15 PACNS, p < .001). Cortical lesions were more frequent in PACNS patients (10 out of 15 vs. 3 out of 13 SuS patients, p = .02), as were hemorrhages (5 out of 15 vs. 0 out of 13 SuS, p = .04) and multiple basal ganglia infarcts (7 out of 15 vs. 1 out of 13 Sus, p = .037). CONCLUSION: Specific clinical and/or MRI findings may help distinguish SuS from PACNS with potential therapeutic implications.

Susac's syndrome: clinical course and epidemiology in a Central European population.

OBJECTIVE: Susac's syndrome is characterized by inflammation and occlusion of pre-capillary arterioles with the clinical triad of branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), encephalopathy and hearing loss. No epidemiological data are available for the disease. METHODS: All neurology departments in Austria were addressed to report adult patients who were on immunosuppressive treatment for a diagnosis of Susac's syndrome between 1 August 2010 and 1 August 2015. Clinical course, treatment regimens, period and point prevalence rates, and annual incidence of Susac's syndrome in Austria in people over 19 years of age are reported. RESULTS: Ten patients with Susac's syndrome were identified, and eight of them were newly diagnosed within the five-year timeframe. Minimum five-year period prevalence of the disease is 0.148/100,000 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.071-0.272), annual incidence is 0.024/100,000 (95% CI 0.010-0.047). Minimum point prevalence rates varied from 0.030/100,000 (95% CI 0.004-0.108) to 0.088/100,000 (95% CI 0.032-0.192). Of all 10 patients, 8 showed typical callosal or internal capsule magnetic resonance imaging lesions at first presentation, 7 presented with BRAO and 5 had hearing loss or tinnitus at the beginning of the disease. Four patients developed the complete clinical triad of Susac's syndrome during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: We provide for the first time population-based data about the clinical course, prevalence and incidence of Susac's syndrome.

[Diagnosis and treatment of rare causes of ischaemic stroke].

Rare causes of ischaemic stroke comprise a plethora of diagnoses of cardioembolic, inflammatory and genetic origin. The differential diagnosis is challenging but important because these disorders (e.g. monogenetic disorders such as COL4A1 mutations) often affect young individuals, they typically require sophisticated diagnostics (e.g. fluorescence angiography in Susac's syndrome) and they are increasingly treatable (e.g. enzyme replacement for Fabry's disease). This review discusses practical considerations and recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances in uncommon causes of ischaemic stroke.